| 000 | 01190cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2915-47 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u6114 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aFitting out and rent reviews | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1993) EGCS 71 (17/4/93) (1) |
||
| 520 | _a"London & Leeds Ltd v Paribas Ltd" CA 1 April 1993. The CA interpreted simple assumptions to be made at a rent review. The assumption that the property was fit for immediate occupation and that `tenant`s works required by a willing tenant had already been completed` did not require the arbitrator in settling the valuation to consider what tenant`s works would be required by the hypothetical tenant. | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aFIT FOR IMMEDIATE OCCUPATION | ||
| 650 | _aGOOD REPAIR | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEW PROVISIONS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c3670 _d3670 |
||