| 000 | 01023cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46858 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u59785 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aLloyd, H. | ||
| 245 | _aDoctors` case hints at need to inform | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v257(7757) 7 August 1992, 20(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the relevance to the construction industry of "Thake v Maurice" in which the HL upheld doctors` claim that their employer had an obligation to make them aware of changed regulations affecting their pensions. Raises the question of a positive duty of disclosure for employers and contractors. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aDOCTORS | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF DISCLOSURE | ||
| 650 | _aEMPLOYERS | ||
| 650 | _aPENSIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSTAGLINE V TYNE SHIP REPAIR GROUP | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c36750 _d36750 |
||