| 000 | 00918cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46934 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u60167 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBairstow Eves (Securities) Ltd v Ripley | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 32 EG 52-55(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 10 June 1992. An appeal by the landlord against a previous decision confirming a valid option to renew was successful. It was held that the tenants had not fulfilled their obligation to redecorate the premises within the last 12 months of the tenancy. The option to renew the tenancy was valid if all covenants had been respected. | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aDECORATION | ||
| 650 | _aOPTION TO RENEW | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c37068 _d37068 |
||