| 000 | 00945cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS46940 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u60179 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMansukhani v Sharkey | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 33 EG 65-66(2) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 15 April 1992. An appeal against the claim for possession under Rent Act 1977 Case 9 of Pt1 Sch15 was successful. The appeal court found that the transfer of the property from parents to son, even though it contained covenants by the appellant with the building society, was a gift; the appellant did not purchase the property and was not landlord of the property. | ||
| 650 | _aGIFT | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGED PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aPOSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1977 | ||
| 650 | _aTRANSFER | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c37077 _d37077 |
||