000			01030cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS47034
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u60492
041			_aeng
245			_aMidland Bank plc v Bardgrove Property Services Ltd and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 37 EG 126-133(7)
520			_aCA 18 June 1992. Excavations at an adjoining development site caused subsidence and damage to M`s property, although B had arranged for shoring and later erected a retaining wall. This latter was taken, during litigation, to be inadequate. Meanwhile M rectified the damage at their own expense but subseqently sued B. Having lost at the first trial, M appealed to establish whether damage as a basis for tort had to be actual, or a future potential. The respondents` defence, however, was allowed.
650			_aBoundary disputes _96221
650			_aLAND SLIP
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37322 _d37322