| 000 | 01211cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47054 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u60616 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPayne, S. | ||
| 245 | _aToo `conservative` a solution? the conservation area test | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aModern Law Review _v55(5) September 1992, 726-732(7) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Bath Society v SoS for the Environment" 1991 and "South Lakeland DC v SoS for the Environment and Carlisle Diocesan Parsonages" 1991 concerning the precise meaning and effect of the `conservation area test` as set out in Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s72(1). Explains the difference between enhancing and preserving. | ||
| 650 | _aBATH SOCIETY V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCIVIC AMENITIES ACT 1967 | ||
| 650 | _aCONSERVATION AREAS | ||
| 650 | _aDESIGNATION | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONTROL | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS ACT 1990 | ||
| 650 | _aPRESERVATION | ||
| 650 | _aSOUTH LAKELAND DC V SOS FOR ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 690 | _aCONSERVATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c37425 _d37425 |
||