000			01715cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS47130
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u60904
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Canterbury CC ex parte Halford
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1992 JPL 851-855(5)
520			_aQBD 18 February 1992. An application for judicial review of the designation of a conservation area in Barham near Canterbury. The applicant (H) owned land presently used for agricultural purposes. In 1991 he applied for consent to build a residential development with a school on this land. Planning permission was refused, An appeal to a public inquiry opened on 10 December 1991. On the evening of 10 December 1991 Canterbury CC resolved to extend the Barham Conservation Area to include this land. the applicant argued that C had acted unlawfully as this land did not have any buildings of historical or outstanding interest. C maintained that buildings were part of the setting and character of the place which could properly be included in a conservation area. QBD discussed interpretation of Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 s69 in relation to the evidence in this case. Held, C had failed to give proper consideration to the material facts including existence and
650			_aAPPEARANCE
650			_aCHARACTER
650			_aCONSERVATION AREAS
650			_aDESIGNATION
650			_aPLANNING LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS 1990
650			_aSETTING
650			_aTREE PRESERVATION ORDERS (TPOs)
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37657 _d37657