000			01495cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS47131
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u60905
041			_aeng
245			_aShephard and Love v SoS for the Environment and Ashford BC
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1992 JPL 827-832(6)
520			_aQBD 5 November 1991. Appellants Shephard (S) and Love (L) appealed to the High Court under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289 against enforcement notices alleging material change of use to a leisure plot. The land in question had been used for exercising and training horses for family use by previous owners. The present owners i.e the appellants continued to use the land for this purpose from 1974 until 1983. Thereafter, two caravans and huts were placed on the land for the two families use at weekends and holiday periods. H argued that the equestian and leisure plot use were both leisure plot activities and therefore a change of use had not taken place. The `Mansi` principle and "Murfitt v SOS" were considered. Held that the Inspector had applied the Murfitt principle correctly. Appeal failed.
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aEQUESTIAN ACTIVITY
650			_aLEISURE PLOT
650			_aMANSI PRINCIPLE
650			_aMATERIAL CHANGE OF USE
650			_aMURFITT V SOS
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37658 _d37658