000			01290cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS47139
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u60917
041			_aeng
245			_aCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Bello and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1992) 64 P&CR 48-56(5)
520			_aCA 8 November 1991. The second defendant M had been engaged by B to renovate a property. Stage payments were expected but not made and it was agreed that M should take over and use the property until B returned to the UK and made full payment. M completed the renovation and moved in in August 1988. In November 1989 the bank obtained a charging order on the property and commenced proceedings for possession and sale. M argued that they had an overriding interest as defined in Land Registration Act 1925. CA held in favour of M on the grounds that they enjoyed exclusive possession of the property despite not paying rent and the case was referred back to ChD for further direction and a further hearing.
650			_aEXCLUSIVE POSSESSION
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
650			_aRENOVATION
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37666 _d37666