000			01621cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS47206
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61047
041			_aeng
245			_aImperial Chemical Industries v Bovis Construction and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1992 CILL 776-778(3)
520			_aORC 17 February 1992. This action arose out of refurbishment and reconstruction of I`s corporate headquarters. I brought proceedings against the management contractor, the architects and the consulting engineers. The essence of the case was that by reason of breach of their obligations to I by each defendant, including the failure to co-ordinate and supervise works, the works took much longer and cost much more than they should have done. No attempt was made in the schedule of claims to link any particular defendant to any particular loss. A global claim was made for the sum of £19m plus professional fees. I accepted a plea from the defendants that the claim for delay and disruption was inadequately pleaded and I was ordered to serve new particulars. This was also unsatisfactory and I was ordered to serve a Scott Schedule containing inter alia the alleged complaint, the defendant against whom the complaint was made, which clause of the agreement had been breached and the alleged fact
650			_aCLAIMS
650			_aDELAYS
650			_aGOBAL CLAIMS
650			_aSCHEDULE OF CLAIMS
650			_aSCOTT SCHEDULES
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37743 _d37743