| 000 | 01370cab a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS37700 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u6282 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aWilliams, D. | ||
| 245 | _a"Repair" reconsidered | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 300 | _a(See also Abstracts 37009 and 37415) | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v282(6331) 25 April 1987, 445-449(3) |
||
| 520 | _aWith reference to caselaw, examines what constitutes 'repair' within the law of landlord and tenant. Pays particular attention to the cases "Elite Investments Ltd v T I Bainbridge Silencers Ltd", which referred to most of the major authorities on the subject, and "Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd", which questioned some of the established views. | ||
| 650 | _aELITE INVESTMENTS LTD V TI BAINBRIDGE SILENCERS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aELMCROFT DEVELOPMENTS LTD V TANKERSLEY SAWYER | ||
| 650 | _aHALLIARD PROPERTY CO LTD V NICHOLAS CLARKE INVESTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aPOST OFFICE V AQUARIUS PROPERTIES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aQUICK V TAFF ELY BC | ||
| 650 | _aRAVENSEFT PROPERTIES LTD V DAVSTONE HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aSTENT V MONMOUTH DC | ||
| 650 | _aWAINWRIGHT V LEEDS CITY COUNCIL | ||
| 650 | _aYANOVER V ROMFORD FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CO LTD | ||
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c3780 _d3780 |
||