| 000 | 01029cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2636-24 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u61214 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aPublic right of way over non-tidal river | ||
| 260 | _c1990 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v7/9/90 p33 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Attorney-general ex rel Yorkshire Derwent Trust Ltd and another v Brotherton and others, CA 31 July 1990, it was held that there was nothing in the literal meaning of the words used in the Rights of Way Act 1932 quite apart from any consideration of the pre-existing law or the mischief which the Act was intended to remedy, which suggested that the Act was not intended to include public rights of navigation over a non-tidal river. | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC NAVIGATION RIGHTS | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHTS OF WAY ACT 1932 S1 | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHTS OF WAY | ||
| 650 | _aRIPARIAN RIGHTS | ||
| 650 | _aRIVERS | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c37876 _d37876 |
||