000			01285cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS47266
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61300
041			_aeng
245			_aRowan v Dann
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1992) 64 PCR 202-213(6)
520			_aCA 4 December 1991. R was a farmer who was afraid that creditors might be able to take possession of his land and granted two tenancies at market rents to D with whom he was engaged in discussions about a joint venture which would have involved using R`s land. No rent was ever paid as R retained shooting rights over the land, although it was agreed that these were not as valuable as the rent. The court found that the leases were a sham to keep off creditors so that the land would remain available for the joint venture. R appealed but this was dismissed on the grounds that as the joint venture failed the land had reverted to him and was therefore an asset to be taken by his creditors.
650			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
650			_aJOINT VENTURE
650			_aSHAM TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37946 _d37946