000			01792cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS47267
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61309
041			_aeng
245			_aBhojwani and another v Kingsley Investment Trust Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 39 EG 138-144(4)
520			_aChD 21 May 1992. In March 1990 the plaintiffs, B, received notice under Law of Property Act 1925 s146 alleging breaches of various repairing covenants together with a schedule of dilapidations. The March instalment of rent was not paid. Two months later K, the defendants, reentered the premises. B claimed possession of the premises from K on the grounds that rentry was effected before a reasonable time for performance of the repair works had elapsed and it was therefore unlawful or they sought relief from forfeiture. They claimed £13,562 as damages for excessive distress alleging that K had impounded their stock valued at £15,00 in respect of outstanding rent of £1,437 and general damages for loss of profit and goodwill. K made a counterclaim for the outstanding quarters rent, damages for breach of the repairing covenant and a small sum for costs and expenses of reentry. In May 1991 K sold their freehold interest with vacant possession to S despite B`s claim for relief from forfeiture ...
650			_aARREARS
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
650			_aNONPAYMENT OF RENT
650			_aRELIEF FROM FORFEITURE
650			_aREPAIRING COVENANTS
650			_aREPOSSESSION
650			_aS146 NOTICES
650			_aSCHEDULE OF DILAPIDATIONS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c37953 _d37953