000 00942cab a2200253 4500
001 WB3101-36
008 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u61523
041 _aeng
245 _aCondition need not be fulfilled
260 _c1994
350 _a0
490 _aTimes
_v6 January 1994, 26(1)
520 _a"Little v Courage Ltd" CA 21 December 1994. Held that a condition precedent in a covenant to grant a new lease that the parties should agree on a business plan and a new business agreement did not need to be satisfied where the landlord subsequently decided that the agreement and plan were not required. Appeal for tenant allowed.
650 _aBUSINESS PLANS
650 _aCOVENANTS
650 _aINNTREPRENEUR
650 _aLEASES
650 _aOPTION TO RENEW
650 _aPUBLIC HOUSES
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942 _n0
948 _c04/03/1997
999 _c38135
_d38135