000			01143cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS47311
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61557
041			_aeng
100			_aHough, B.
245			_aPlanning law and domestic privacy
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1992 JPL 906-912(7)
520			_aDiscusses the case "Wallington v SoS for Wales et al", (Abs45337) in which the CA was asked to consider the legality of keeping 44 dogs in a domestic dwelling house. The question was raised as to whether development control penetrated more deeply into the rights of individual ownership than other controls and this could legitimate more extensive restrictions on activities pursued on his property by the landowner.
650			_aCHANGE OF USE
650			_aDEVELOPMENT CONTROL
650			_aDIMINANT USE
650			_aHOBBY
650			_aKENNELS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S22
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S55
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38164 _d38164