| 000 | 01689cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47313 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u61570 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aColley V Canterbury CC | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1992 JPL 925-936(12) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 20 March 1992. In 1961 outline planning permission was granted in respect of land to demolish the house on it and build a new one subject to conditions and detailed approval. Detailed plans were approved in 1963 however although the house was demolished the new one was not built. In 1986 the land was purchased by the respondent C who believed that the 1961 permission had lapsed so they applied for fresh permission. This was refused but C were told that the original permission was still valid and that they should consider proposals for implementing it. In November 1987 the council gave notices that they had submitted an order for confirmation by SoS revoking the 1961 permission. The SoS confirmed the revocation order in August 1989. C gave notice of a claim for compensation. The main issue before LT concerned the construction of Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s45 and 164. It was agreed that C were entitled to compensation for any depreciation in the value of their interest in t | ||
| 650 | _aLANDS TRIBUNAL ACT 1949 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S164 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S45 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S55 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c38173 _d38173 |
||