000			01514cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS47315
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61581
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Newbury DC ex parte Stevens and Partridge
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1992 JPL 1056-1064(5)
520			_aQBD 13 March 1992. Outline planning permission was granted for the construction of a hotel, sports facilities and link road. Conditions were attatched to the permission requiring the submission of full details of the layout, siting and design of the buildings, access and landscaping within three years. A separate condition provided for a landscaping scheme. The applicants, S, did not submit an application for reserved matters until March 1988. The planning authority had however changed their minds about the suitability of the scheme. In October 1988 the Director of Planning Services wrote to S saying that the landscaping details were unsatisfactory but that it proposed to issue the reserved matters consent with conditions relating to the submission of details of this scheme. In Autumn 1989 other developers sought planning consent on the site for housing. At the inquiry the council stated that S`s permission had lapsed as there had been no full approval of reserved matters within the
650			_aOUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38181 _d38181