000			01499cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS37709
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u6342
041			_aeng
245			_aPanther Shop Investments Ltd v Keith Pople Ltd
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v282(6332) 2 May 1987, 594-597(2)
520			_aChD 21 January 1987. Concerned the construction of a rent review clause in a lease. In 1979, a lease granted to the tenants for 20 years, provided for five yearly reviews. A previous lease had existed between the parties, and during this period the tenants erected a back extension and storage building. These were in existence when the 1979 lease was granted, and had become landlords` fixtures. The issue was whether the effect on rent of these structures, erected as improvements before the present lease began, was to be disregarded. It was held, on consideration of the CA decision in Brett v Brett Essex Golf Club Ltd that "improvements" for the purpose of the rent review clause, meant improvements to the demised premises; the structures in this case were not improvements to the premises, but part of them. Declaration that the effect of the improvements did not fall to be disregarded for the purpose of the review clause.
650			_aDISREGARDS
650			_aFIXTURES AND FITTINGS
650			_aTENANTS IMPROVEMENTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c3819 _d3819