000			01584cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS47330
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61635
041			_aeng
245			_aFG Whitley and Sons Co Ltd v Bickerton and others
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aStructural Survey _v11(2) Autumn 1992, 179-194(9)
520			_aQBD 24 February 1992. In November 1973 planning permission was granted for mineral extraction which was vigourously opposed by neighbours and the local authority. The permission would lapse if operations did not start within five years. A scheme was submitted in July 1977 with the help of the defendant, B, a chartered surveyor. The local auhtority delayed consideration of the scheme and, as at 30 November 1978 there was no approved scheme, the permission lapsed. W sacked B and issued a writ claiming damages for breach of contract and in the tort of negligence. The question was whether the action was statute barred ie if they owed a contractual duty only. It was clear that any breach of contract must have pre-dated the termination of instructions, which is five years before the writ was issued so that course of action was by statute barred. The arguement therefore concentrated on the course of action in tort and therefore on the date damage was sustained. The allegations were that no
650			_aBREACH OF CONTRACT
650			_aMINERAL EXTRACTION
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38227 _d38227