000			01124cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS47333
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61644
041			_aeng
245			_aWhelton Sinclair (a firm) v Hyland
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 41 EG 112-115(4)
520			_aCA 1 May 1991. Appeal against a decision in the County Court whereby judgement was given to the defendant against a claim for fees, made by Whelton Sinclair, a firm of solicitors. Briefly, at issue was whether the plaintiff firm had been instructed, and whether duty was owed in contract and/or tort.The case primarily concerned whether Mr Hyland gave the solic- itor instructions in connection with the negotiation of a new lease. Held, dismissing the appeal. The judge was entitled to find that telephone conversations had taken place; when instructions were received by way of telephone conversations, a concluded contract to act on behalf of the defendant arose.
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38233 _d38233