000			01617cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS47339
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61663
041			_aeng
245			_aWood v Berkeley Homes (Sussex) Ltd
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1992) 64 PCR 311-322(7)
520			_aCA 13 February 1992. The plaintiffs, W, were the purchasers and the defendants, B, were the vendors of property under a written agreement. One clause of the agreement provided that the title should consist of an office copy of the entries on the register and a filed plan and that National Conditions of Sale should apply except in so far as they were consistent with the agreement. The National Conditions of Sale provided that the abstract in title in relation to land registration comprised the document that the vendor was required to furnish under Land Registration Act 1925 s110. In May 1989 B`s solicitors provided W with a photocopy of B`s land certificate at the time of last inspection. The solicitors also informed W that office copies had been applied for. On 23 May 1989 B`s solicitor stated that service of the photocopy of the land certificate was sufficient under the contract and served notice to complete in 10 days. On 12 June W`s solicitor wrote disrupting the validity of the n
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925 S110
650			_aHM LAND REGISTRY
650			_aNATIONAL CONDITIONS OF SALE
650			_aNOTICE TO COMPLETE
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38245 _d38245