000			01580cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS47375
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61772
041			_aeng
245			_aLand Securities plc v Westminster CC
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1992 44 EG 153-158(3)
520			_aChD 29 July 1992. Raises question of whether an arbitrator`s award determining the market rent of a property is admissible evidence in another rent review relating to a comparable property. The premises in question Westminster City Hall in Victoria Street are let to the defendant tenant Westminster CC on a 99-year lease by plaintiff landlord Land Securities plc. Lease provides for rent review at which the rent is to be fixed at two thirds of the fair market rack rent at the review date. The review which took place in March 1991 was referred to arbitration. The arbitrator issued directions that normal rules of evidence should apply. During the course of the hearing, L discovered that another arbitrator had issued an interim award in a rent review between Pearl Assurance plc and SoS for Environment determining the market rent on another office building in Victoria Street and applied to the arbitrator for leave to adduce the other arbitrator`s award as evidence of the rental value of th
650			_aADMISSIBILITY
650			_aARBITRATORS' AWARDS
650			_aCOMPARABLE PROPERTY
650			_aEVIDENCE
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
690			_aARBITRATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38310 _d38310