000			01563cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS37712
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u6366
041			_aeng
245			_aBrooker Settled Estates Ltd v Ayres
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v282(6330) 18 April 1987, 325-326(2)
520			_aThis case concerned the question of whether the occupier of a flat was a tenant or a licensee . The owners appealed against a decision in the county court, which held the occupier to be a tenant; claiming the respondent was a licensee under the terms of a written agreement; that she had broken the terms of the licence and therefore, they were entitled to possession . The respondent pleaded that she occupied the flat under the terms of an oral agreement, and was a tenant protected by the Rent Acts . The county court had considered Street v Mountford in arriving at his decision, and concluded there was no evidence that attendance or services were provided and, referring to the definition of lodger and tenant in that case, the occupier must have had exclusive use of the room, which, therefore, made her a tenant. The CA held that the county court had erred. In Street v Mountford, it was conceded that Mrs Mountford was entitled to exclusive possession but in this case, the matter was not
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c3832 _d3832