| 000 | 00887cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53746 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u6375 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aOrdeal by pollution - the case of the Peking Garden | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aENDS Report _v(248) September 1995, 21-24(4) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders how there can be legitimate grounds for abatement of local taxes when an enforcing authority contributes to a pollution problem by failing to apply planning or pollution laws. Relates an example where a restaurateur won exemption from paying community charge and business rates on pollution grounds. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS RATES | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMUNITY CHARGE | ||
| 650 | _aPOLLUTION CONTROL | ||
| 650 | _aRELIEF | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c3839 _d3839 |
||