000			01783cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS47442
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u61969
041			_aeng
245			_aRoyal Life Insurance Ltd v SoS for Environment and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1992 43 EG 145-150(4)
520			_aQBD 14 July 1992. Application by Royal Life (R) under Acquisition of Land Act 1981 s23 to quash part of the Bristol Development Corporation (Temple Mead/Kingsley Village Part 1) Compulsory Purchase Order 1990 made by second respondent Bristol Development Corporation (B) and confirmed by first respondent SOS (S). R alleged that S had failed to address the question of viability raised by way of `caveat` in his inspector`s report. B made the cpo in respect of 11 ha of land in the Bristol urban development area south east of the city centre. 4 ha of this land belonged to R. Held that although B`s evidence related to part of this site, the inspector had evidence before him relating to the whole of the scheme. QBD upheld his process of reasoning for the cpo despite the `caveat`. Furthermore, the SoS had discharged his task of seeing that B acted responsibly. S was under no obligation to analyse viability and so it cannot be said that he wrongly delegated that analysis to B. R should pay S`
650			_aACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981
650			_aBRISTOL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING AND LAND ACT 1980 S142
650			_aURBAN REGENERATION
650			_aVIABILITY
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38455 _d38455