000			01331cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS52122
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u62192
041			_aeng
245			_aR v SoS Environment ex parte Bagshaw and Norton
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1994) 68 PCR 402-411(10)
520			_aQBD 28 April 1994. B and N applied separately to their respective county councils for orders to modify the definitive maps and statements of the rights of way in their areas. B sought to add a footpath and N a by-way relying on witness evidence of 20 years of uninterupted use. Both applied to the SoS against council decisions not to make the orders. This failed for lack of evidence and inconclusive proof. B and N applied to quash the decisions claiming that the SoS had used the wrong test in considering the evidence. Allowed on the grounds that the evidence necessary to establish that a right of way is reasonably alleged to subsist in less than that needed to show that a right of way does subsist.
650			_aDEFINITIVE MAPS
650			_aFOOTPATHS
650			_aRIGHTS OF WAY
650			_aWILDLIFE AND COUNTRYSIDE ACT 1981 S53(3)(C)(I)
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c38639 _d38639