| 000 | 01591cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47512 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u62329 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aClarke v SoS for the Environment and another | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v1992 42 EG 100-106(4) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 12 June 1992. Raises the question of whether the inspector had applied the proper test in deciding whether the erection of a building was a permitted development under the General Development Order (GDO) 1988. Appeal by SoS for Environment against the HC decision of 5 July 1991 allowing an appeal by the applicant (C) from a decision by the inspector dismissing his appeal against an enforcement notice issued by M. In 1990, C erected a building on his 40ha of farmland without planning permission. On 9 April 1990, the planning authority M issued an enforcement notice ordering C to remove the unauthorised building and return site to agricultural use. C appealed under s174(2) Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The inspector dismissed C`s appeal on the grounds that the building was not designed for the purposes of agriculture. He also found that C had designed the building with the intention of developing a sheep unit and was satisfied that C was engaged in an agricultural business, ke | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL USE | ||
| 650 | _aGENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aPERMITTED DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSHEEP UNIT | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c38737 _d38737 |
||