| 000 | 01029cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47560 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u62485 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBurton, M. | ||
| 245 | _aCCT - comparing the old plans with the new ones | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aMunicipal Journal _v(47) 20-26 November 1992, 14-15(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses recent government amendments to the original proposals outlined in "Competing for Quality". In terms of construction-related services, the original `double-envelope` system whereby councils set a quality threshold and then select the lowest bid is to be dropped. This leaves local authorities to demonstrate that they have their own procedures for fair and even-handed evaluation of tenders on the grounds of quality as well as price. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPULSORY COMPETITIVE TENDERING | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL AUTHORITIES | ||
| 650 | _aTENDERING | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c38822 _d38822 |
||