| 000 | 01263cab a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS53762 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u6471 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aChallock Parish Council v Shirley and others | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 42 EG 137-141(5) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 12 October 1995. Disputed rights of access over a verge in 1988 were settled by consent order. Para 8 of the order required S to pay a percentage of the difference in value when the subject land was sold for development as in "Stokes v Cambridge". In 1993 the land was sold for development and S brought judicial definition of development gain for the purposes of para 8. Held that the serviced plot basis of valuation be adjusted. | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aCHALLOCK PARISH COUNCIL V SHIRLEY AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT GAIN | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aOUTLINE PLANNING CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHTS OF ACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aSERVICED PLOT BASIS | ||
| 650 | _aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE | ||
| 650 | _aTOMLIN FORM | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION METHODS | ||
| 650 | _aVALUE | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c3884 _d3884 |
||