| 000 | 01258cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47592 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u62576 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTeam Services plc v Kier Management and Design Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v1992 CILL 786-787(2) |
||
| 520 | _aORC 5 October 1992. Claimants (T) were subcontractors to the defendants (K). T contended that K were entitled to deduct a cash discount from the imterim payments only if the interim payments were made within the time agreed by the subcontract and additional documents. It was "held" that discount deductable should be treated differently from deduction of retention monies and amounts previously paid. K`s entitlement to deduct cash discounts from interim payments was dependant upon payment of interim payments within the time required by the subcontract. (ABS47169) | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCASH DISCOUNT | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aINTERIM PAYMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aRETENTION MONIES | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c38860 _d38860 |
||