000 00818cab a2200193 4500
001 WB2444-03
008 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u62688
041 _aeng
245 _aReservation of shooting and sporting rights
260 _c1988
350 _a0
490 _aEGCS
_v1988 137
520 _aIn Inglewood Investment Co Ltd v Forestry Commission , CA 18 October 1988, it was held that the word " deer " was conspicuous by its absence from the reservation . Had the word deer been in the mind of the draftsman of the 1921 indenture he would have used it. Where legislation referred to game such as the Game Act 1831 deer were not included unless they were expressly mentioned.
650 _aSPORTING RIGHTS
690 _aRURAL PRACTICE
942 _n0
948 _c04/03/1997
999 _c38923
_d38923