| 000 | 01211cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47647 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u62810 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aIDC Group Ltd and others v Clark | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 49 EG 103-105(3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 2 July 1992. D brought an action against C, sublessee of a flat in adjoining premises, relating to an agreement in a deed which provided for a fire escape route through a party wall in to an area now occupied by C`s flat. At some point the doorway had been blocked, but it was not known when or by whom. D tried to get an injunction to open the doorway and claim damages in lieu. C provided an alternative escape and D could only claim damages. C contended that the original agreement in the deed was not a personal one and had not been brought to her attention when she bought the flat. This was upheld. D appealed. It was "held" that the appeal should be dismissed. (See also ABS45895) | ||
| 650 | _aEASEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aFIRE ESCAPE | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT OF WAY | ||
| 690 | _aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39013 _d39013 |
||