000			00986cab a2200181 4500
001			WB2705-43
008			090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u62907
041			_aeng
245			_aLiability of surety
260			_c1991
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1991 1 (26/1/91)
520			_aIn Cerium Investment Ltd v Evans and another , CA 18 January 1991, it was held that the word ` void ` in clause 4 of a licence giving consent to the assignment of a lease , means voidable at the option of the plaintiff therefore licenses should be construed as meaning that if either of the two conditions was not fulfilled the licenses were voidable at the option of the plaintiff; the plaintiff had not exercised that option. The clause had been inserted for the benefit of the appellant lessor who was entitled to waive compliance with the condition either expressly or by conduct.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c39082 _d39082