| 000 | 01396cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47690 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63076 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBlythewood Plant Hire Ltd v Spiers Ltd (in receivership) | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1992) 48 EG 117(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCounty Court 31 July 1992. B applied for a new tenancy of premises owned by S under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II. A receiver was appointed under a debenture in respect of the property and undertaking of S. Initially S opposed the granting of a new lease, but eventually proposed terms of five years at a rent of £80,000 pa and a review on the penultimate day of the term. The issues before the court included, whether the lease should contain a development break clause, the amount of the new rent and the amount of the interim rent. It was "held" that B should be granted a 10-year term with a development break clause capable of operating at the expiry of the seventh of any subsequent year of the term. The rent of the new lease was determined at £41,700; interim rent £20,000pa. | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 | ||
| 650 | _aLEASE TERMS | ||
| 650 | _aNEW TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39208 _d39208 |
||