000			01498cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS47694
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u63096
041			_aeng
245			_aShuwa Ashdown House Corporation v Grayrigg Properties Ltd and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v1992 46 EG 108-111(4)
520			_aChD 27 July 1992. Raises a question of law on two identical rent review clauses in two leases, the first relating to a shop in Victoria Street, London SW1; the second to a display case adjoining the shop. The plaintiff company (S) is owner of the shop; the defendants (G) are the original lessee and the present lessee by assignment and are members of the same group of companies. Leases provided for two rent reviews one of which was to take effect on 25 March 1990. In accordance with the review, the date of increase was 25 March 1990 and the review date was 25 December 1989. S argued that he had not forfeited the right to review the rent by reason of not having obtained a certificate from an independent valuer by 25 March 1990 in default of the rent review clause. G disagreed. Found in favour of the landlord due to a proviso in the clause.
650			_aCERTIFICATE
650			_aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE
650			_aINDEPENDENT VALUATION
650			_aRENT REVIEW
650			_aTIME OF THE ESSENCE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c39223 _d39223