000			01514cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS47749
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u63318
041			_aeng
245			_aHorace Brenton Kelly v Margot Cooper and another
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1992) 3 WLR 936-944(9)
520			_aCA 19 October 1992. The defendants (C) were instructed by the plaintiff (K) to sell his house, commission to be a percentage of the selling price. C were also instructed to sell the property next door. An offer by a prospective buyer for the adjacent property was accepted. He then offered to buy K`s house. C did not inform K of the agreement to buy the other house and K accepted the offer. Sales of both houses were completed. K instituted proceedings against C to claim damages for breach of duty and conflicts of interest. C counterclaimed for their commission. K were awarded damages and declared C were not entitled to commission. The Court of Appeal of Bermuda allowed C`s appeal. It was "held" that it was the business of estate agents to act for numerous principals, several of whom might be competing and whose interests would conflict.
650			_aBERMUDA
650			_aCOMMISSION
650			_aCONFLICTS OF INTEREST
650			_aDUTY TO DISCLOSE INTEREST
650			_aESTATE AGENTS
650			_aFIDUCIARY DUTY
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c39371 _d39371