000			01460cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS52147
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u63520
041			_aeng
245			_aBarnett and another v O`Sullivan
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1995) 04 EG 153-155(3)
520			_aCA 19 May 1995. In 1960, shortly after acquiring the property, B rented a room to S. Prior to 1984 B acquired another property in the same road and planned to move to that converting the original into three self-contained flats. S and B`s son moved to the new property in February 1984. B did not move in till a week later. In February 1992 S was given notice to quit. The CC judge made an order for possession accepting that B were resident landlords for the purposes of Rent Act 1977 s12(1)(h). S appealed on the grounds that B was not in residence until a week after the tenancy has been granted and was therefore not a resident landlord. Appeal dismissed on the grounds that it was purely fortuitous that it was convenient and sensible for S and B`s son to move first.
650			_aNOTICE TO QUIT
650			_aRENT ACT 1977 S12(1)(H)
650			_aRENTED ROOM
650			_aRESIDENT LANDLORDS
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c39479 _d39479