| 000 | 00891cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2829-06 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63583 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aIdntifying defendant to action | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _v40(4) 23 July 1992, 47(2) |
||
| 520 | _a"Tokola Project Services Ltd and High Force Engineering Co Ltd v NV Victor Buyck and Victor Buyck Ltd" HC 25 July 1992. The court had to determine, which defendant was responsible in the action. The problem in identification was caused by failure to formalise contractual arrangements at the time. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCANARY WHARF | ||
| 650 |
_aContracts _96232 |
||
| 650 | _aDOCKLANDS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39526 _d39526 |
||