| 000 | 01093cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2845-47 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63630 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCourt can overlook planning inspector`s error | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _v19 November 1992, 30(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"PG Vallance Ltd v SoS for the Environment and another" QBD 13 October 1992. The court applied Rules of the Supreme Court Order 55 rule 7(7) to dismiss an application to appeal against a planning decision. Although it could have been argued that the planning inspector had erred, there had been no damage or miscarriage of justice. | ||
| 650 | _aAPPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aERRED IN LAW | ||
| 650 | _aMISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aORDER 55 RULE 7(7) | ||
| 650 | _aORDER 94 RULE 13(7) | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPEAL | ||
| 650 | _aRULES OF THE SUPREME COURT | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S289 | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39563 _d39563 |
||