| 000 | 01056cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2829-36 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63754 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRelevant date of occupation | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v23 July 1992, L&T18(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Omar Parks Ltd v Elkington"; "Ron Grundy (Melbourne) Ltd v Bonehevo" CA 8 July 1992. The court considered the construction of Mobile Homes Act 1983 schedule 1 para 5 and found that the site owner, in terminating an agreement under this paragraph to position a mobile home on a protected site, must satisfy the court that the occupier is not occupying the home as a sole or main residence at the time of the court hearing as opposed to the time when the owner applies to the court. | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE HOMES ACT 1983 SCH 1 PARA 5 | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE HOMES | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPATION | ||
| 650 | _aPROTECTED SITES | ||
| 650 | _aSOLE RESIDENCE | ||
| 690 | _aHOUSING-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39654 _d39654 |
||