| 000 | 01204cab a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47879 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63848 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aEhmler and another v Hall | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 02 EG 115-117 (3) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 31 July 1992. It was held that a landlord, who lost rent when his property was damaged by a motorcyclist, could claim loss of rent against the motorcyclist. "Rust v Victoria Graving Dock Co" (1887), cited by the appellants, in which a reversioner could only sue in respect of damage, which would continue to affect the property after the reversion of the lease, was not found to be applicable to this case. | ||
| 650 | _aCAR SHOWROOMS | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGE TO PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGE | ||
| 650 |
_aInsurance _96249 |
||
| 650 | _aLOSS OF RENT | ||
| 650 | _aLOST RENT | ||
| 650 | _aMOTORCYLE ACCIDENT | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aREVERSION OF LEASE | ||
| 650 | _aTORTFEASOR | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39721 _d39721 |
||