| 000 | 00951cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47880 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63854 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLondon & Leeds Estates Ltd v Paribas Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 04 EG 119-124 (4) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 23 July 1992. This case concerned the meaning of `fit for immediate occupation and use`. At the rent review the tenant, who had paid for the fitting out of offices, maintained this should be taken into account at the rent review whereas the landlord took the phrase at issue to be without any assumption as to whose expense the fitting out had been. | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aEXPENDITURE | ||
| 650 | _aFITTING OUT | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aTENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39726 _d39726 |
||