000			01471cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS53801
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u6666
041			_aeng
245			_aBrown & Root Technology and another v Sun Alliance and London Assurance Co Ltd
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1995) 3 WLR 558-572(15)
520			_aChD 16 June 1995. The first plaintiff (A) was a partly-owned subsidiary of the second plaintiff (B) when a 25-year lease was granted for premises by the defendant (S). The lease was registered at the Land Registry. Four years later A became a wholly-owned subsidiary of B, and upon request S granted a licence to assign the lease to A. This assignment was not registered with the Land Registry - thus, under the Land Registry Act 1925 the leasehold interest remained with B. When A served notice to terminate the lease S refused its acceptance. Held, refusing that notice was valid under, the 1925 Act provisions.
650			_aASSIGNMENT
650			_aBREAK CLAUSES
650			_aBROWN AND ROOT TECHNOLOGY LTD AND ANOTHER V SUN ALLIANCE AND LONDON ASSURANCE CO LTD
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925 S22(1)
650			_aLEASE TRANSFER
650			_aLEASES
650			_aREGISTERED LAND
650			_aTERMINATION OF LEASE
650			_aUNDERLETTING
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c3974 _d3974