| 000 | 01067cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2813-31 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u63926 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNegligent claims | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9211) 21 March 1992, 125(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe discussion about negligence claims in tort or in contract is furthered by a recent case, "Hiron v Pynford South Ltd" 1991, where the tortious and contractual duties coincided so that a tortious obligation would only have given the plaintiffs a longer period, within which to sue, and if this was a condition required it could have been added into the contract. Therefore, it seems an action in tort is not always acceptable. | ||
| 650 | _aBELL V PETER BROWNE AND CO | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY OF CARE | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aTAI HING COTTON MILL LTD V LIU CHONG HING BANK LTD | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39778 _d39778 |
||