| 000 | 01325cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47918 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64048 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGood and another v Epping Forest DC | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1993) JPEL 127-133 (7) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 14 April 1992. The applicants sought a declaration that a s52 agreement in which the previous farm owner had covenanted that the dwellinghouse he wanted to build would be occupied by someone in agriculture and that the house would not be sold apart from the rest of the farm, was ultra vires, null and void. At issue was the use by the local planning authority of such a stringent s52 agreement rather than including these provisions in the condition for planning permission. The claim was dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY | ||
| 650 | _aDOE CIRCULAR 01/1985 | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING OBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPPG7 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 | ||
| 650 | _aS52 AGREEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39865 _d39865 |
||