| 000 | 00861cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2316-43 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64089 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aContractors` employees | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _v19(3) 16/4/87 p51 |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the outcome of the case Heasmans (a firm) v Clarity Cleaning Co Ltd CA 23 January 1987, which concerned an employee of the cleaning firm making phone calls on the clients premises without permission. The CA found that in the absence of an express term in the contract, the cleaning company and its insurers were not vicariously liable for the employee`s behaviour. | ||
| 650 | _aINDEMNITY INSURANCE | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39894 _d39894 |
||