000			01483cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS53809
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u6699
041			_aeng
245			_aTribe v Tribe
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aNew Law Journal _v145(6714) 6 October 1995, 1445
520			_aCA 26 July 1995. A father who was the main shareholder of a clothing company and tenant of a number of shops which the company occupied, transferred his shares to one of his sons in order to safeguard his interests, following the serving of notices of dilapidations on two of the shops. The landlord of one of the shops then accepted a surrender of the lease, and the tenant purchased the revision of the lease on the other. He then wished to restore his shareholding position, but the son refused to transfer the shares back to him. The father issued a writ, upheld in the court below, that claimed his son had been holding the shares as bare trustee, with agreement to return them upon demand or when the dispute over dilapidations had been resolved. The son denied this agreement. Appeal dismissed, finding that property transfered for illegal purposes can be recovered where those purposes are not carried out.
650			_aBARE TRUSTEES
650			_aPRESUMPTION OF ADVANCEMENT
650			_aSHAREHOLDINGS
650			_aTRANSFER OF SHARES
650			_aTRIBE V TRIBE
690			_aLAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c3992 _d3992