| 000 | 01167cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47969 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64239 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aCornes, D. | ||
| 245 | _aLate decision | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aNew Builder _v(164) 26 February 1993, 18(1) |
||
| 520 | _aCites "Balfour Beatty v Chestermount Properties" as example of where a contractor has passed the extended completion date, is causing delay, and is then instructed for a variation which has the effect of delaying completion further. In upholding the arbitrator`s decision in C`s favour, the court ruled that the developer`s architect had the right to grant extensions of time during a period of culpable delay by B, if employing the `net` basis of deductions rather than the `gross`. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPLETION DATE | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aDEDUCTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aDELAY | ||
| 650 | _aEXTENSIONS OF TIME | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c39995 _d39995 |
||