| 000 | 01040cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS47972 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u64248 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMinogue, A. | ||
| 245 | _aJCT87 limits redress over defective work | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v258(7780) 5 February 1993, 22-23(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe case "GPT v Panatown" illustrates the difficulties an employer may find in recovering losses caused by the remedy of defective work from a project conducted under JCT87. Retention money may not provide appropriate security. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTS LIABILITY PERIOD | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aJCT MANAGEMENT CONTRACT 1987 | ||
| 650 | _aRETENTION MONEY | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-DEFECTS AND FAILURES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c40002 _d40002 |
||